Atl. Madrid – Real Sociedad TIP: 1 ODD: 1.50 FT: 2:1
FC Juniors – BW Linz TIP: 2 ODD: 1.50 FT: 1:0
Santa Cruz – Real Potosi TIP: 1 ODD: 1.40 FT: 4:1
single fixed match of the day
Punters who anticipated Manchester City’s mishap scooped a fortune from the bookmaker
Another overwhelming evening for Manchester City fans. This opportunity The Citizens came out powerless against Crystal Palace. Many are thinking about the amount you could’ve won wagering on such a result.
There was just a single top choice in his matchup. The Sky Blues won 5 of their last successive matches with a 17:4 objective contrast! Then again, Crystal Palace has won just 1/8 of its latest installations and to Etihad Stadium with no expectations for progress.
Shockingly for all, Eagles were driving before the half time and figured out how to net an equalizer to bring a significant and merited point back home from Manchester. How about we discover the amount you could’ve won wagering on this match.
City’s triumph was evaluated at 1.07 (7/100) by the oddsmakers from Betfair, while away group win was given the chances of 40.00 (39/1) at Betsafe. The attract which gave off an impression of being the ultimate result of the match got the chances of 13.50 (25/2) by the bookmaker Betsson.
You could’ve likewise discovered some worth wagering on the AH (+3) alternative valued at 1.73 (73/100) by Betfred. The most, be that as it may, was scooped by the individuals who supported the 2/X HF/FT choice, which means away group winning before the half and a draw at full time. Such a situation was given the chances of 67.00 (66/1) by Betfair. Another fortune was generally scooped by the individuals who sponsored the Correct Score – 2:2 alternative valued at 61.00 (60/1) by the bookmaker Bet-Tips.co.
Namungo – Raja Casablanca Pick : Over 1.5 (1.45) FT 0:3
The impact of the ball ownership on the consequence of the match
Handily created investigation before the match can be the way in to an effective bet. Among the football fans and bettors, there is a prominent attitude saying that the group with the higher ball ownership is bound to win. Is it valid? Allow us to discover.
During Euro 2016, the Spanish public group had the most elevated ball possesion
The players from the Iberian landmass for quite a long time have been known for their adoration for playing the ball for the long time with numerous passes. The pioneer of such style is the group of FC Barcelona, with her celebrated tiki taka – a football style in which many interminable short-passes across the field are made. With time, the Spanish public group additionally began utilizing this framework and adjusted it. Toward the starting it end up being exceptionally successful, helping Spain in winning two Euro’s and a World Cup, yet with time it become stale and unsurprising.
During the all around referenced Euro 2016, Vicente del Bosque players were the ones with most noteworthy ball ownership in the competition. Notwithstanding all that, they were wiped out in the 1/8 match, losing to Italy (0:2) which favored very surprising style.
Spain’s ball ownership, which was 59%, demonstrated pointless in this game. Known for their protective methodology Italians, gotten their back and afterward scored objectives after a set piece and an error by David de Gea and counter-assault toward the finish of the match. Yet, to do that, Antonio Conte’s players needed to run 8 km more than their Spanish adversaries (118 km – 110km).
Much more dreadful for La Furia Roja was the past large competition, the 2014 World Cup in Brazil, where they finished their investment at the gathering stage and got embarrassed by the Netherlands. In spite of having a great time ownership of at any rate 60% in each game, they couldn’t rule their adversaries and wound up returning home before the genuine rivalry even started. For a normal football fan it was particularly odd in light of the fact that Spaniards completely overwhelmed football for quite a long time, dominating in last 3 significant competitions,
amsterdam fixed matches
being the solitary group at any point to win every one of them three (Euro, World Cup, Euro) in succession. Their presentation at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa was applauded and yet they were the least objective scoring champion ever (scarcely 8 objectives in 7 games). They had normal 60% of ball ownership in each game and in play-off round it was considerably higher. It was their arrangement to control the game yet additionally to debilitate the adversaries who toward the end had little ball ownership, will or even solidarity to battle.
Since, as each individual who at any rate once played this delightful game knows, nothing disappoints and depletes as much as pursuing the ball. The Spanish public group consummated the capacity to win matches with as little exertion as it very well may be mostly a direct result of their ball ownership (simultaneously tiring the rival). Each game in the play-off stage was comparative. Subsequent to loosing the ball, del Bosque men constrained, took it back and indeed began the tiki-taka, debilitating and dampening their adversary. They did that while winning 1-0 with Portugal, Paraguay, Germany lastly with Netherlands in the last. (amsterdam fixed matches)
According to the perspective of the competition it is an ideal score – you went through next adjusts with an insignificant exertion. At long last everyone quit saying that Spain plays alluring yet incapable football. Spanish style was celebrated and acted like a model for different groups from one side of the planet to the other who regularly endeavored to duplicate it, most occasions fruitlessly. We will expound regarding this matter later on.
Portugal have won Euro 2016 with lesser ball possesion than its adversaries
Fascinating are the measurements of ball ownership for the remainder of the groups of the Euro 2016. Perhaps the best outcome with respect to the ball ownership was that of public group of Ukraine – simultaneously considered as the most exceedingly awful group of the competition. For this situation the high ball ownership didn’t bring about triumphs or even a solitary point. Additionally, the Ukrainians didn’t score an objective in the entire competition. The justification such insights of this group could be that while loosing in each game, the Ukrainians needed to play the ball in desire to change the outcome while their rivals let them have the ball and counter-assaulted them effectively simultaneously resting for their potential next matches.
Same thing goes for England in the game with Iceland. Massive distinction in ball possesion (63% – 37%) shots (18 – 8) and corner kicks (7 – 2) demonstrated futile for the English side. The bold Icelanders notwithstanding losing the objective in the initial couple of moments of the game, returned and drew the score, yet additionally dominated the game, in what was subsequently depicted as quite possibly the most suprising brings about Euro 2016. Just 37% of the whole ball possesion was sufficient for the Iceland group to send Rooney and his English side back home.
amsterdam fixed matches
A total suprise of the French competition was the group of Portugal. Terrible showings in the gathering stage with 3 draws, at that point fortunate games with lower percenatage of ball possesion and a ton of favorable luck was sufficient for Portugal to turn into the European Champion. All it took them to get those brilliant decorations was 41% ball possesion with Croatia in 1/8 play-off round, 46% with Poland in quarter-last, same 46% with Wales in semi-last and eventually 47% in the fantastic finale with have group of France.
You can ask why such specialized virtuosos as Ronaldo, Nani, Quaresma or Renato Sanches let Poland or Wales to play the ball, all things considered, those groups have a strong safeguard and fast counter-assaults in their DNA, they battle playing the ball. Was it possibly a technique of Portugal mentor not a mishap? It appears to be that Portuguese director thought (very much like del Bosque in 2010 and 2012) that to win a competition it is more imperative to play successfully and productively not alluringly, zeroing in on strategies and dominating each match with the least exertion conceivable.
For Jose Mourinho high ball possesion just brings inconveniences
Well known for some contentions he starts, the Portuguese supervisor expresses that ball ownership is just numbers for the analysts and it no affects the result of the match since what includes is the thing that is in the net. He went significantly further by saying that high level of ball ownership just methods inconveniences. It is ideal to guard your objective firmly and sit tight for the chance to hit with a quick and dangerous counter-assault.
These are not just meaningless statements spoken by an envious man. He was the one that carried out this guarded yet compelling style in his groups, for instance in a match between his Chelsea and Liverpool on Anfield toward the finish of the 2013/2014 Premier League season. (amsterdam fixed matches)
Mourinho’s methodology was to give the activity to The Reds and hang tight for their error, even the littlest slip. Indeed, even before the match, The Special One couldn’t anticipate that, as it ended up, the Liverpool slipped…literally. Toward the finish of the primary half, when there was as yet a goalless draw 0:0 and Liverpool totally overwhelmed, The Reds skipper, Steven Gerrard inadvertently slipped and left Demba Ba with open way to the Liverpool objective, Chelsea striker put the ball into the net with no issue. In the subsequent half, regardless of steady pressing factor from the host group and their great 73% of ball ownership it was Chelsea players that counter-assaulted and obliterated the fantasies of the Liverpool side for first Premier League title since 1990.
Atletico Madrid, in spite of having a low ball possesion was creeps from winning the UEFA Champions League
Practically through the whole 2013/2014 UEFA Champions League crusade the Atletico Madrid technique was exceptionally basic – giving the ball to the adversary and zeroing in on their ideal protective. This methodology matched with players bound for that sort of football assisted Los Colchoneros with changing from a hopeful, strong group into one of the European top sides that alarms even the greatest monsters of football. In the entire competition Diego Simeone players had a normal 40% of ball ownership and 60% of their objectives were set pieces or counter-assaults. This system paid off up until the 93 moment of the last in Estadio da Luz in Lisbon when Sergio Ramos header saved Los Blancos and leveled the match. Tired Atletico Madrid players were then obliterated in the additional time by their unpleasant opponents from Real Madrid.
Another model is a game between Celtic Glasgow and Barcelona in the 2012/2013 Champions League release. The gathering match between these different sides was simultaneously the long term commemoration of the Scottish club and the host group couldn’t request a preferable birthday present over a match with Blaugrana at its prime at their home ground of Celtic Park. With the awesome help from the pressed arena, the host group beat one of the best football crews ever, despite the fact that their ball ownership was just 11%, with 89% of the whole ball ownership for Barcelona. Notwithstanding making 955 passes (Celtic made just 166) Lionel Messi and his Spanish side lost.
With critical ball possesion you win titles not single games
This assertion was once said by one of the top football chiefs and you should concede, that there is a reality in it. As it was at that point referenced, both Spanish public group and Barcelona appear to in any case be effective, regardless of periodic misfortunes (like the one with Celtic) and have been in the football world class for some, numerous years, winning various prizes. Also, despite the fact that football is flighty, taking a gander at a greater picture one could see that the groups with higher ball ownership have better opportunities to win, obviously that doesn’t mean they will consistently win… (amsterdam fixed matches)